« October 2007 | Main | December 2007 »

Using “interesting items” as an annual outreach tool

File this under ideas that I just don’t have time to work on.

Articles_thumbs

Every few months I’ll see an article that I feel everyone should read—very well written, seminal, synopsis pieces. The most recent one that comes to mind is from Wired about the switch to alternative fuel. It summarizes the current problems, explores the challenges, and is overall very readable, yet weighty.

I was thinking about the New Year and how everyone has top 10 lists for this and that and it could be cool for libraries to create one page lists (not bibliographies) of “interesting items” that were published over the past year—maybe with a very short two sentence annotation.

Think about it in terms of our profession. What are ten things (books, articles, editorials, blog posts, listserv discussions, podcasts, webcast, whatever—format agnostic) that everyone should read? What is representative of 2007? Probably something about digital preservation, something about 2.0, something about shifts in organizational structure, something about outreach and promotions, something on building/space design, something about Next Gen Catalogs, etc. Maybe couple this with a few buzzwords, trends, challenges, and predictions.

Now apply that same scheme to other disciplines—what are the topical “things” for engineering, computer science, business, medicine, psychology, the arts, etc. Who won major awards in the field? What are people blogging about besides celebrities? What is the buzz in various categories? What should everyone know about?

HBR does something like this annually for innovative ideas—and it’s always a great read—so why not do something more locally? Customize it for your library community. Public libraries should do something like this because I’ve always found them to be busy throughout the holidays with people grabbing up movies, music, cook books, and pop fiction, so why not try and expand their minds with a “10 things you should be reading” list? With academics, this could be another way to reach faculty. Just drop it off in their office, send it along with books they request, email it, or leave them around the classrooms, or at the department holiday party, whatever. My library is slammed with students finishing up the semester, but they might be interested in picking up a glossy, one page, easy to read, discipline specific handout as they head out the door. Especially if it looked cool. And it would be even better if the handout included a url to the library blog or a website that linked to all the titles online, along with other items of potential interest.

The goal should be to keep it concise and to not push the library too much—this kind of thing probably works better to pique patron interest with a soft sell on our part. Keep it limited to items that are easily accessible, readable (not too scholarly/boring), and of general broad interest. For example: clean tech is quickly growing in popularity, so where’s that definitive Time Magazine or NYT article?

In summary: Instead of addressing faculty with scholarly communications, information literacy, budget cuts, or collection development needs, why not approach them with ideas? Big ideas that they will be interested in. You might just be able to get your foot in the door for future conversations, but first you have to give them a reason to care. Think about their interests instead of your own.

Ah, but Brian this is so much work. You said yourself that you don’t have time to do this, how can I fit it into my schedule?

Indeed, it would take some planning. Maybe instead of doing every discipline you can focus on one or two, or scrap the discipline idea all together and go for the broadest audience possible. This is the type of sub-committee that ACRL should have. A group of 10 librarians who can meet/work online dumping discipline specific articles into a wiki over the course of a year so that all librarians (not just ACRL members) can have access  and use them for various outreach initiatives.

Oh, but this will never work at my library. We have to ask permission and get approval. Everything has to go through the upper echelons.

Wow, sorry to hear that your library is still back in the 1950’s. The library profession really needs to learn about salesmanship. If your administration keeps things on lock-down, I suggest you leverage your subject librarian role. (If you’re not a subject librarian you’re out of luck.) Look at your job description and strategic plan and it probably says something about outreach—this is a part of your responsibilities. Use projects like the 10 articles list, youtube, facebook, and tagging to interact with your community. Your job as a liaison is to sell the library to that specific group. You’re a professional and therefore you should have the freedom to accomplish this task however you see fit. The way I see it, I own Mechanical Engineering (until we hire someone) so I’m constantly trying to find new windows of opportunity. (Hmmm, that sounds like a good title for my next book) in which I can fit the library into their world. So my advice: try stuff—if you get in trouble apologize and say that you were only try be innovative and that you’ll gladly just sit and twiddle your thumbs at the reference desk instead of proactively engaging users.

Tagging in Compendex: social bookmarking for engineers

I have to give Elsevier their props-- they are really trying to improve their interfaces. Perhaps this is old news, but I was working with a grad student today and we were deep into Compendex and I noticed that they are offering tags. It's nice to see that these 2.0 technologies are finally finding their way into our databases.

How it works
When you do a search and view a citation you see this box:

Tag_box_compendex

Public = all registered Compendex users can see them
Private = just you
Institution = everyone at your school

I'm not sure how practical tags are because the Ei terms are pretty fantastic-- but from a voyeuristic stance it is fascinating to see what others have tagged. 

Tags_public

Groups
Probably the most useful application of this tagging system is the ability to create a group. These are tags that can only be viewed by other group members. This is great if you work in a highly specialized area and you want to share items of interest with others. What I especially like is that the groups are not limited to your own institution and that you can invite anyone else to be a member too, as long as they have access to Compendex. This allows researchers to interact with peers from other institutions and the ability to easily and quickly share information.

My Plan
Over Winter break I am going to experiment by creating a few groups based around a handful of the centers/labs that we have here at Georgia Tech. After tagging a few articles I'll invite several of the faculty members to join and offer to demonstrate the tagging feature to them and/or their graduate students. It could totally flop, but it should be a good test of the tagging feature.

So thanks Elsevier for trying something new. Glad to see all of our subscription money is going to good use. How about next you work on "group notes" so that we could leave messages or make comments about the research to our peers? Just something to think about.

Remind me again why we don't have a national academic/scholarly repository

This is how we do Thanksgiving at my house— does anyone want to come over for dinner?
Thanksgiving

SSRN
On the front page of the Chronicle a few weeks ago was an article about the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) – actually it was about the launch of the Humanities Network, but it’s all part of the same family. I’m not very well versed in the IR world, but it seems like this type of tool is more valuable. Why not support a national repository instead of hundreds of smaller ones? Why not also build in social features so scholars can talk, comment, and network. I hate to be harping on the same old theme, but it seems like too much duplicated effort rather than a cooperative process that benefits everyone. Hmm, maybe I’m a socialist after all?

I’m sure this topic has been covered in-depth elsewhere, so please forgive my ignorance. It just makes sense that scholars should be able go to a central place to share and discover research in their own and related disciplines. However, if we wait long enough I’m sure Google will get to it.

A note to all of you holiday shoppers—buy a Dell or buy a Mac, but don’t buy Hewlett Packard. I tried to save a little money and I’m paying for it by constantly losing data. It's tragic!

Finally, this one goes out to Mr. Bell.

Shadow Men & SeaDragon – a mixed bag post

Shadow Men

Shadowman_georgia_tech
We have a big HVAC renovation going on in our library. One of our signage pieces includes a shadow man holding construction info located on each floor. They were constructed out of corkboard which is extremely difficult to cut. Trust me! We're planning to add yellow construction hats after Thanksgiving to spice it up.

Ok, so the point is that these shadow men are attached to shelves near the elevators and are extremely effective because they always kind of surprise me when the doors open. Your mind tricks you into believing that someone is really standing there. I've actually seen people stop and read the information, so it works. (Thanks to Dottie Hunt for the vision on this project.)

SeaDragon

Bleak_house_seadragon_demo

A few weeks ago I caught a presentation by Microsoft fellow Gary Flake . He has a book out titled The Computational Beauty of Nature , you should add it to your collection. He gave a talk about web searching from the perspectives of the end-user, the corporation, and the scientist. More info . However, what I really enjoyed was the first 15 minutes when he showcased some software called SeaDragon . That link provides basic info, however you can see the potential of the software by installing Photosynth . Video Demo here .

One of the examples they've created is an artist's workshop. You can look around, zoom in and out, and get a 360 panoramic view. However what's really cool is that you can click on a painting and it opens in full view with the option to zoom in and out. This could work in a library too where you have a shelf of books and the ability to click on one and then view the text in column format. It's perfect for the iPhone world of pinch and pull browsing.

Here is video that puts it all into perspective.

CDW-G - tell us the story

Printers_gatech

CDW-G missed out on a branding opportunity. They feature our library in a recent Chronicle advertisement (and of course they had to sneak the cliché books in to make it appear scholarly) yet they don’t mention Georgia Tech. They should have connected it to our ACRL award and something along the lines of their equipment serving a dynamic community and could even drop a number like over one million pages are printed each year, etc.

They should have devised a story rather than just a photo of some random students at some random library. Why not feature several different libraries throughout the year and link to case study material online about how great their printers, computers, and electronic accessories work. Show how easily they can be configured, and how users love them. Make it easy for campus and library IT staff to adopt successful systems. Tell us the story, give us examples, explain why a library should use your products. Let me compare my setup with others to see if would be beneficial to switch.

About Brian

My Photo

My Online Status

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2006